.
I have improved the table in my piece on the International Math Olympiad to show point and points per participant for each race.
| Race | Participants | Points | Points per participant |
| White males | 254 | 4381 | 17.2 |
| White females | 34 | 403 | 11.9 |
| East Asian males | 114 | 2702 | 23.7 |
| East Asian females | 6 | 85 | 14.2 |
| West Asian males | 37 | 461 | 12.5 |
| West Asian females | 6 | 74 | 12.3 |
| Black males | 34 | 65 | 1.9 |
| Black females | 7 | 5 | 0.7 |
| South Asian males | 28 | 392 | 14.0 |
| South Asian females | 1 | 3 | 3.0 |
| Mestizo males | 25 | 287 | 11.5 |
| Mestizo females | 2 | 19 | 9.5 |
| Indio males | 9 | 101 | 11.2 |
| Austronesian males | 3 | 36 | 12.0 |
It can be seen that—with, of course, all due allowance for size of countries and different training regimes—East Asian males run away with the points per participant score, followed by white males, East Asian females, South Asian males, and West Asian males. Consolidating West Asians with whites, which is reasonable on phylogenetic grounds, doesn’t affect the rankings.
If you consolidate the sexes by race the points per participant rankings go:
| East Asian | 23.2 |
| White | 16.6 |
| South Asian | 13.6 |
| West Asian | 12.4 |
| Austronesian | 12.0 |
| Mestizo | 11.3 |
| Indio | 11.2 |
| Black | 1.7 |
If you consolidate the races by sex:
| Males | 16.7 |
| Females | 10.5 |
(I apologize for the funky formatting; our software doesn’t handle tables well.)
