Climate Change Treaty A Precursor To Global Government?

Writing for World Net Daily, Dr. Jerome Corsi


states,
"A former science
adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says
the real purpose of the United Nations Climate Change
Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is to use global
warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a
one-world government."

Corsi
quotes Lord Christopher Monckton as


telling
a


Minnesota Free Market Institute

audience at Bethel University in St. Paul,
"Your president
will sign it. Most of the Third World countries will
sign it, because they think they`re going to get money
out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes from the
European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody
won`t sign it."

Corsi
quotes Monckton as also saying,
"I read that
treaty and what it says is this: that a world government
is going to be created. The word `government` actually
appears as the first of three purposes of the new
entity."

See
Corsi`s column

here.

To
see a YouTube video segment of Lord Monckton`s address
go

here.

Plus,


here

is a
later Fox Business interview with Lord Monckton, in
which he further expands his thoughts:

Did
Lord Monckton exaggerate?

My
research of the Climate Change document that Monckton
references found the following: it is a 181-page working
document that does not mention the words
"ballot,"
"elected
official," or
"vote" anywhere in it. In my opinion, Lord Monckton
did not exaggerate; if anything, he may have understated
the situation. The document does indeed appear to be the
institutional framework for an unelected supreme
communist-style world government.

By
signing this document, the United States (and other
industrial nations) will forever take responsibility for
the ills of backwards and third world countries. And,
according to Lord Monckton, this would include China and
India, along with the countries of Africa. Notice:

• 
  
  Page 6,
  "PP.15 Further acknowledging that developed
  countries have a historical responsibility for their
  disproportionate contribution to the causes and
  consequences of climate change, reflecting their
  disproportionate historical use of a shared global
  carbon space since 1850 as well as their proposed
  continuing disproportional use of the remaining
  global carbon space . . . Warming of the climate
  system, as a consequence of human activity, is
  unequivocal."

• 
  
  
  Page 38, "28.
  The adverse effects of climate change and response
  measures, due to the historical cumulative GHG
  emissions of developed countries, constitute an
  additional burden on all developing country Parties
  (particularly low-lying and other small island
  countries, countries with low-lying coastal, arid
  and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods,
  drought and desertification, and developing
  countries with fragile mountainous ecosystems) in
  reducing poverty, developing strategies to address
  social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable
  development and a threat to achieving the United
  Nations Millennium Development Goals."

• 
  
  
  Page 122,
  "17. (a) Compensate for damage to the LDC`s economy
  and also compensate for lost opportunities,
  resources, lives, land and dignity . . ."

• 
  
  
  "(b) Africa, in the context of environmental
  justice, should be equitably compensated for
  environmental, social and economic losses . . ."

• 
  
  
  
  By signing and being party to this document, we are
  accepting legal financial responsibility to support
  non-developed countries FOREVER.

• 
  
  
  
  
  Page 27, "(b)
  Particularly vulnerable populations, groups and
  communities, [or] All vulnerable groups whose
  adaptive capacity is low, [or] Groups requiring
  special protection . . ."

• 
  
  
  
  
  Page 39, "33.
  [The financial burden] must be at least USD 67
  billion (in the range of USD 70-140 billion) per
  year."

The
commitments of the developed countries are "economy wide."
Page 58, "7. (a)
Mitigation commitments by all developed countries are
legally binding economy wide and absolute quantified
emission reduction commitments."

• 
  
  "(b) Mitigation actions by developing countries are
  VOLUNTARY . . ."
  (Emphasis added.)

The
system appears to be loaded to ensure that the world
body overseeing this document is granted total control
for the enforcement of the requirements of this document
throughout all developed countries. Penalties for
non-compliance by developed countries are scattered
throughout the document.

It
appears that what a U.S. President and Congress (Republican

or



Democratic)
could not do through the constitutional legislative
process, they are attempting to do through
international treaty.

Therefore, it is my studied opinion that Lord Monckton`s
assessment that this upcoming Climate Change Convention
in Copenhagen is a
"pretext" for
the establishment of one world government is
"spot-on."

It
does seem to be getting clearer and clearer that if the
elected civil magistrates in Washington, D.C., do not
quickly grow some backbone and develop some sagacity as
to the direction these globalists are taking our
country, resistance will be forced (in one way or
another) upon the States and the People, because it is
not possible for the policies and financial burden that
are–and will be–levied upon the backs of the American
people to be sustained without the surrender of
independence, the abridgment of constitutional
government, and the loss of liberty. Stay tuned.

Dr. Chuck Baldwin is the
pastor of Crossroad Baptist Church in Pensacola,
Florida. He hosts a

weekly radio show. His
website is

here.