Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise.
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Good news is on the horizon for
homeowners
facing foreclosures. But the origin of the glad
tidings is curious, to put it mildly.
What's emerging is that financial institutions in
their race to rack up ever increasing profits neglected
the most basic bookkeeping tasks.
As reported in the New York Times:
"notes that underlie mortgages placed in
securitization trusts must be assigned to those trusts
soon after the firms create them. And any transfers of
these notes must also be recorded." [Guess
What Got Lost in the Loan Pool, by Gretchen
Morganson, New York Times, February 28, 2009]
In comparison with
bilking the public out of billions, formally
recording a change in ownership is tedious and time
consuming—stuff for the grunts to do.
But suddenly, for those who didn't bother, it looms
as a huge problem.
For institutions too lax to tend to
details, and bankruptcy courts are discovering many that
did not, it means that if they cannot prove they own
your mortgage, they can't throw you out.
Think of it this way. A
borrower in arrears on his payments gets a letter
from the ABC Bank saying it's foreclosing and he has 90
days to vacate. But he replies: "Who are you? I got
my loan from XYZ Bank. Prove to me that you hold my
mortgage."
Here's an example given by the Times.
On February 11th, a
Miami-Dade circuit court judge set aside a judgment
against Ana L. Fernandez, a borrower whose home had been
foreclosed and then repurchased on January 21st
by Chevy Chase Bank, the institution claiming to hold
the note.
But Chevy Chase couldn't produce evidence that the
original lender had assigned the $225,000 note to it.
As a result, Fernandez remains in her home.
The potential for
chaos is enormous.
According to
Inside Mortgage
Finance, during 2005 and 2006, eight million
sub prime mortgages with an aggregate value of $1.6
trillion were put into securities pools for resale
to investors. Even if only a small percentage has
incomplete documentation, endless litigation could
result.
Adding to the probability of increased lawsuits is
growing group of consumer attorneys who have argued for
years that the process of pooling residential mortgages
into securities is too haphazard to be reliable. Those
lawyers now train their peers nationwide to alert them
to the litigation possibilities.
Careless bookkeeping is on the
American Bankruptcy Institute's annual spring
meeting agenda beginning on April 3.
A paper titled "Where's the Note,
Who's the Holder: Enforcement of Promissory Note Secured
by Real Estate," [DOC
|
HTML]co-written by the
Honorable Samuel Bufford and
R. Glen Ayers, a former federal bankruptcy judge in
Texas, analyzes the problem in more detail
Ayers, a lawyer at
Langley & Banack
in San Antonio, said documentation problems will prevent
a lot of foreclosures.
The report cites another expert who
estimates that as many as one-third of "securitized"
notes have been lost or destroyed.
In such cases, those who may claim to hold the note
but cannot prove it therefore do not have the right to
foreclose.
In the meantime, when the court is not convinced that
the documentation is proper, delinquent borrowers can
remain in their homes.
I asked Ayers exactly how long a
person caught up in these
strange circumstances might expect to stay.
Ayers replied: "If
a lender goes to a court to foreclose by judicial
foreclosure and cannot prove that he/she/it owns the
note or is an authorized agent of the note holder, and
the case is dismissed, I think that the land owner
continues to occupy the property and makes no payments
to anyone until someone comes along with the right
evidence."
In what
would be an amazing twist of fate instead of being
foreclosed upon, the homeowner stays put—possibly
indefinitely and rent free—until someone can produce the
note.
For the luckiest of them, that day will never come.
Joe Guzzardi [email him] is a California native who recently fled the state because of over-immigration, over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality of life. He has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the growth rate stable. A long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently appears in the Lodi News-Sentinel.