Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise.
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
In
California, the unemployment rate is
12.1 percent.
Only four states have higher unemployment: Michigan,
Rhode Island, Oregon and South Carolina.
California's unemployment picture is unique, however,
because it has hit men disproportionately.
Out of every four jobs lost nationwide since the
recession began in December 2007, three were held by
men.
Some experts have dubbed the phenomenon a
"mancession."
The adverse affect on family income is easy to
understand. Men traditionally work in the high-paying
manufacturing and
construction fields, the two most devastated
California industries.
Women on the other hand are employed in lower paying
service, health care or
education jobs.
The good news is that women have managed to keep their
jobs. The bad news is that when men are laid off, their
larger incomes (women earn just 78 percent of what a man
is paid in a similar occupation) and benefits including
costly
medical insurance are lost, too.
[California Unemployment Rises to Record 11.5% in May,
by Marc Lifsher and Alana Semuels,
Los Angeles Times,
June 20, 2009]
Nationally, the employment picture is equally bleak.
During his campaign, President Barack Obama promised the
American public that the hundreds of billions of dollars
pumped into the economy would prevent layoffs and
revive America.
Obama sold his economic stimulus package by predicting:
"Our plan will
likely save or create 3 to 4 million jobs…. Ninety
percent of these jobs will be created in the private
sector." (Listen to Obama's speech
here.)
To
say that Obama broke his promise is an understatement.
Since making his campaign pledge, Obama's administration
has seen unemployment skyrocket to a
national level of 9.4 percent according to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Broken down over the last six months, job losses are as
follows: February: 651,000; March, 663,000; April,
539,000; May, 303,000; June, 443,000; July, 247,000
As unsettling as these figures are, a complete picture
of unemployed America evolves when the underemployed are
factored into the equation.
A
Lou Dobbs/CNN special titled
"Jobs Now"
concluded that nearly 30 million Americans are either
unemployed or underemployed. (Watch
here)
The official unemployed population is 14.5 million. But
when economists add 8.8 million part time workers who
want but cannot find full time jobs and 6.2 million who
have been unemployed so long that they are no longer
included labor statistics surveys, then the total
unemployed reaches 30 million.
With any serious uptick in jobs unlikely and with the
economy still staggering, analysts wonder if in
2010 mid-term elections the Democrats will pay the
political price for their failures.
Republicans like to compare the political climate in
1994 during Bill Clinton's first term when the
Republicans regained Congress and Obama, 2010.
Two major factors are in play today for Obama that were
not involved back in 1994. Neither bode well for Obama
(or the Democrats) over the short or long term.
Leading up to the 2010 mid-term elections, the current
uproar over unemployment,
the mortgage crisis, the deficit and most
importantly health care dwarf anything that occurred in
1994.
Under Clinton, the country had already pulled out of a
recession but nevertheless the Democrats suffered
catastrophic defeats by losing 54 representatives in the
House and eight in the Senate.
If
the Congressional mid-terms went badly for the Democrats
in 1994 under much better economic circumstances,
even larger 2010 defeats may loom.
As
for Obama and
2012, while that date is a long way off, dark clouds
are gathering.
Although Clinton had no trouble getting reelected in
1996, he is a much smarter and smoother politician than
Obama. The liberal Clinton,
an Oxford scholar, understands economics.
Obama on the other hand knows nothing about economics
and is on the
extreme left wing of his party as opposed to the
majority of Americans who are moderates.
While it's uncertain whether the Republicans will
capture either the House or the Senate next year, they
will made significant gains. By so doing, the GOP will
lay a foundation for 2012 to take both Congress and the
White House.
Joe Guzzardi [email him] is a California native who recently fled the state because of over-immigration, over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality of life. He has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the growth rate stable. A long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently appears in the Lodi News-Sentinel.