Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise.
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
Toward the middle of every week, I
check the
News-Sentinel blog to see how readers have
responded to my column from the preceding Saturday.
I'm always curious to measure how
effectively I've made my argument. And I look for
valuable feedback from readers who may point out an
angle that I might have overlooked.
The columns that have generated the
most passionate reader reaction are the critical ones
that I've directed at
President George W. Bush and those that reflect
my immigration reduction philosophy.
Three weeks ago, commenting on two
stories by News-Sentinel reporter Jennifer
Bonnett about the
Lodi Unified School District's English as a second
language classes,
I wrote that after more than twenty years of
teaching
adult ESL, I had serious doubts about its
effectiveness.
In my summary, I made two central
points.
First if the district, and in fact,
the America, wants to reduce the
huge numbers of non-English speakers that drain
increasingly scarce financial and teacher resources, the
Mexican government will have to fulfill its obligation
as a sovereign nation-state to provide for its citizens.
Instead, Mexico actively
pushes them toward California where they bring their
school age children. Once here, more children are born.
Second, unless the decades-old trend
of
unchecked illegal immigration reverses itself,
America as we know it will cease to exist.
Some News-Sentinel readers
objected.
Some feel that a
multicultural, multilingual California would be a
richer, more rewarding place to live.
Others say that California once
belonged to Mexico and it is only just that, through
immigration, the state will gradually revert to its
original status.
Still another group concluded that I
am too harsh on the young second language learners. One
invited me to go to
Stanford University where her former ESL student is
pursuing an advanced degree.
All those views are well and good.
And many Californians hold them.
But here's the key thing. Every
single one of them is an opinion and arguable.
Maybe bilingual signage and
pressing 1 for English doesn't bother you. But it
does me.
Mexico, in fact, did once own the
California territory. But
Mexico lost a war with the U.S., willingly signed a
treaty, accepted payment in exchange for its land and
thus allowed the U.S. to acquire California
legitimately.
And sure, we can find ESL successes
at Stanford and maybe even Harvard too. But with the
California Hispanic high school dropout rate at about 25
percent, it's obvious that there are more failures than
successes.
We can argue and argue and argue.
But there's no disputing my two
conclusions. Like it or not, they're fact-based and 100
percent accurate.
To repeat, the students
overwhelming our schools are either illegally in the US
or the illegal aliens' children. If the U.S. enforced
immigration law, they would still be in their native
countries.
And if the border remains wide open,
then
the America that many Lodians and I grew up in is
finished.
Should anyone care to challenge
either of those two points, please feel free to contact
me.
I'll make one final but important
point that readers also overlooked.
Although some charged me of
"hate," I'll simply say in my defense that I
didn't pull the statistics out of the air. Don't kill
the messenger.
Bonnett's original story and the
column I followed up with cited the Pew Hispanic Center
and the U.S. Census Bureau as calculating that by 2050
Hispanic K-12 student enrollment would increase by 116
percent nationwide and that two thirds of all San
Joaquin Valley children are Hispanic.
Does that make the
Census Bureau and the
Pew Hispanic Center "hate" organizations?
The reality is that to deal
effectively with the increasingly high rates of
non-English speakers in California's public education
system, we have to address what I refer to as
politically incorrect "hate facts"— that is,
facts that no one refutes but everyone ignores because
of their connotation.
As long as no one---except maybe
me---dares to talk about them, then you can expect more
of the same, at least until 2050.
For now, that's as long as the
Census Bureau looks ahead.
Joe Guzzardi [email him] is a California native who recently fled the state because of over-immigration, over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality of life. He has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the growth rate stable. A long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It currently appears in the Lodi News-Sentinel.