The Mark Williams Fiasco—A Silly Surrender By Tea Party "Leadership"
"It
doesn't matter what this sign says, you'll call it
racism anyway."
That's
a popular sign
at Tea Party rallies. But it's a firm sentiment among
those who understand The National Question and have
experienced its truth
when discussing,
no matter how innocently, any issue involving race or
ethnicity.
If
you're white, and refuse to accept President Barack
Hussein Obama's rhetorical usurpation of your country,
you're a racist. If you're white, and you refuse to
accept
Mexican immigration's destruction of your neighborhood,
you're a racist. If you're white, and you oppose the Islamification of America because you believe the United
States is at least historically a nation built upon the
foundation of Christianity, you are, again, a racist.
So
the "Conservative" Establishment, which ought to oppose this, has long
learned to shut up and keep to their talking points
about "fiscal
responsibility,"
"constitutionally
limited government" and
"free markets."
Now the national Tea Party movement has followed suit.
Those slogans, along with a fierce-looking Paul Revere
in silhouette, emblazon the internet banderole of the
National Tea
Party Federation, which
has recently, amid much publicity, banished talk show
host
Mark Williams, leader of the based Tea Party Express, to the outer
darkness.
Williams, you see, dared
ridicule the
NAACP—that
group of black professional shakedown artists who see a
racist under every bed.
That
Mark Williams has been purged suggests that he
understands what is at stake in this country. It isn't just
about free enterprise and our constitutional freedoms,
or whether Ben Stein gets a great reception at a college
campus. In short, Williams gets it.
After the NAACP passed its now infamous resolution
calling on the Tea Party to expel its racist members,
Williams unbosomed himself of a piece of satire poking
fun at "colored
people"
It was a
letter to the
Great Emancipator,
Father Abraham
himself.
"Dear
Mr. Lincoln:
"We
Coloreds have taken a vote and decided that we don't
cotton to that whole emancipation thing. …
"In
fact we held a big meeting and took a vote in Kansas
City this week. We voted to condemn a political revival
of that old abolitionist spirit called the 'tea party
movement.'
"The
tea party position to 'end the bailouts' for example is
just silly. Bailouts are just big money welfare and
isn't that what we want all Coloreds to strive for? What
kind of racist would want to end big money welfare? …
"And
the ridiculous idea of 'reduce[ing] the size and
intrusiveness of government.' What kind of massa would
ever not want to control my life? As Coloreds we must
have somebody care for us otherwise we would be on our
own, have to think for ourselves and make decisions!
"The
racist tea parties also demand that the government 'stop
the out of control spending.' Again, they directly
target coloreds. That means we Coloreds would have to
compete for jobs like everybody else and that is just
not right.
"Perhaps the most racist point of all in the tea parties
is their demand that government 'stop raising our
taxes.' That is outrageous! How will we coloreds ever
get a
wide screen TV
in every room if
non-coloreds get to
keep
what they earn? Totally racist! "
And so went the satirical letter from "Precious Ben
Jealous, Tom's Nephew" and "NAACP Head Colored
Person."
Juvenile, of course—although the idea that
welfare has become a form
of slavery has
long been a standard conceit among house-broken
conservatives like
Jack Kemp.
But a firing offense? Do we believe in free speech or
what?
Nevertheless, the National Tea Party Federation
reacted as
quickly as the
colonial American pictured on its home page:
"The Racists Are
Coming! The Racists Are Coming!" It demanded that
the Tea Party Express
"publicly rebuke"
Williams. Said rebuke must
"take the
following form"—or else:
"1.
Mark Williams must be officially removed from the ranks
of the Tea Party Express.
"2.
Notice of Mark Williams' removal must be placed
prominently on the official Tea Party Express website.
3. Tea
Party Express must issue a press release articulating
points 1 and 2 above."
The
Tea Party Express, greatly to its credit,
refused—whereupon the Federation expelled Williams
and his organization.
Williams has
published something of an
apology at his Web site, but for all intents and
purposes, he stuck to his guns. Good for him.
Of
course, Williams uttered the usual platitudes in his
apology. Conceding that he went too far, he wrote,
"I reiterate what
I and every tea partier have said repeatedly: We
denounce racists of any color and all those who seek to
divide the American People along any lines."
(In
a late-breaking development, the NAACP's Jealous may be
reaching out to Williams in the wake of Obama
Administration official
Shirley Sherrod's forced
resignation
after the revelation of her speech to an NAACP group
apparently gloating about
denying aid to a white farmer).
Despite the obligatory cant, Williams knows very well
who "seek[s] to
divide the American People", and it isn't the whites
who opposes or in many cases voted for the son of an
alcoholic
Kenyan
bigamist
and
radical white mother as president of the United States.
Indeed, when necessary, Williams jettisons the tea party
line that touts the virtues of a race-blind society
governed by men (and women, of course), who understand
the rule of law, free markets, limited government, and
the Constitution, etc.
That
might be one reason
he denounced
the Ground Zero mosque. The
Cordoba Initiative's
principal backer is an imam
who supported
the unsuccessful and Hamas-backed Gaza flotilla and
seeks
to impose Sharia law in the United States. He wants to build
The Cordoba House at the
site of the now missing
World Trade Center towers,
which are missing precisely because that imam's
co-religionists (even if incensed by America's misguided
imperial policies in the Middle East) knocked them down
with two passenger jets on
Sept. 11, 2001.
The
Cordoba Initiative,
Williams wrote at his blog,
"would consist of
a Mosque for the worship of the terrorists' monkey-god".
For
good measure, Williams rightly
described
Islam as a
"7th-century
death cult coughed up by psychotic pedophile,"
referring to Mohammed's
marriage to 6-year-old Aisha.
Naturally, the spokesmen for Islam demanded an apology,
and
they got one
— sort of: "I was
wrong and that was offensive. I owe an apology to
millions of
Hindus
who worship
Lord Hanuman,
an actual Monkey God."
Indeed. As conservative and former Capitol Hill staffer
Jim Jatras observed in an
article
in 1989, Muslims
actually
worship
"the former chief
deity of the polytheistic Arab pantheon — a variation on
the moon god common throughout the ancient Middle East,
among the Babylonians known as Sin (the Sinai peninsula
is probably named after him) and among the Sumerians as
Nanna — stripped of his consorts and offspring. … In
short, Islam is a self-evident outgrowth not of the Old
and New Covenants but of the darkness of heathen Araby.")
That
article sent Muslims into a rage. They demanded,
unsuccessfully, Jatras' ouster as a key Republican
staffer. (He's
now in the private
sector.) To
paraphrase H.L. Mencken, it isn't lies that hurt;
it's the truth.
Williams may have misspoken about the Muslim deity. But
he was right to puncture the myth, widely accepted by
gullible dim bulbs, including some tea party Americans no
doubt, that Islam
is merely an amalgam of
Judaism and Christianity. That said, Williams was likely
as incensed about this as Americans would have been in
1946 if the government had allowed the
Japanese
to build a shrine at
Pearl Harbor.
Anyhow,
Williams'
"expulsion" as a leader
within the Federation—if one can be expelled from a
movement that has no real membership list or list of
officers, shows just what is at stake in the debate over
President Obama's policies and what they mean for the
future of this country.
Conservatives and even liberals,
including
Geraldine Ferraro,
have
rightly complained that
any criticism of Obama
brings on the accusation of
"racism". The inevitable result of Williams' ouster is that Obama's
supporters will now utter that charge even more
frequently.
Undoubtedly, the tea party movement contains a
contingent of such people, just as Obama's movement
contains
Communists,
murderers and child molesters. Yet most Tea Partiers
clearly aren't
"racists," at least in the sense the Southern
Poverty Law Center and NAACP use that hackneyed term.
Anyway, the question is how long it will be before any
criticism of Obama or any other black person is simply
not allowed.
Williams understands this. And he clearly knows that the
United States of America is more than an
"idea"—that
the liberties Americans enjoy depend more upon what kind
people live here and govern, pace the National
Tea Party Federation, than upon merely defending
abstract libertarian ideological tenets traveling under
the names of
"fiscal responsibility",
"constitutionally
limited government" and
"free markets".
Indeed, because these ideas, particularly the latter two
— and let's include the rule of and respect for the law
— are rooted in the Christian conception of human nature
and political liberty, they depend upon citizens imbued
with
and educated in a Christian cultural milieu.
Asian, African and Mexican or Central American (Aztec
or
Mesoamerican)
immigrants don't understand them because they come from
cultures in which
raw power,
corruption and superstition control their lives.
That
zoning ordinance limits a single-family dwelling to one
family, meaning parents and children?
Ignore it.
Pack in the in-laws and cousins, too!
The
law respects a woman's place in society. Ignore it. If
she disobeys,
beat her
to a pulp or
chop off her head.
The
law forbids
drinking and driving? Bah.
Macho men
swizzle a 12-pack and put the pedal to the metal.
Williams gets all this—and so do many if not most
tea-party Americans, despite brainwashing by the media
and government schools.
Problem is, the tea-party leaders either don't get it
or don't care to get it.
And as long they speak for "conservatives" and other real Americans, Obama and his janissaries have nothing to stop them from dispossessing those upon whom this country's prosperity and political liberty ultimately depend: people who look like Mark Williams.
A.W.
Morgan
[Email
him]
is fully recovered from prolonged contact with the
Beltway Right.
He now lives in America.