Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise.
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
There is no doubt that GOP
presidential nominee John McCain's greatest weakness
among conservative voters was his
support for
amnesty for illegal aliens. Despite his claims that
his campaign imploded because of his support for the
surge in
Apart from
Ron
Paul,
Tom Tancredo, and
Sam
Brownback, every single
Republican candidate
supported
the surge. But apart from John McCain, every single
Republican candidate opposed his amnesty. But, due to
the
staggeringly short memory of Republican voters,
McCain was able to
reinvent
himself as a
semi-restrictionist who would
"Secure the
Border First," and somehow managed to win the
nomination.
Conventional wisdom was that if McCain
chose a VP to appeal to the conservative base, it would
be someone who had a record of (or at least perceived
as) being tough on illegal immigration.
Mitt Romney and
Tim Pawlenty were the two frontrunners. McCain's
surprise choice of Gov. Sarah Palin has
more than energized the conservative base. But
should her record make Americans less concerned with
McCain's position on amnesty?
The conservative response to Palin
makes me think of the late country singer
Keith Whitley's song,
"You
say it best, when you say nothing at all." Palin
has barely said a word or done a thing on immigration.
But many immigration patriots assume she's a
restrictionist. After all, why would a
moose hunting hockey mom and
bane of the liberal elite support amnesty?
Most
explain away Palin's inaction and silence by arguing
that immigration isn't an issue in
The Mexican Government is opening a
consulate in
However, immigration is also enough of
an issue that Palin felt compelled to pander to minority
immigrants and promise them government goodies. When
running for governor in 2006, she
replied to the
"The state has
seen big growth of minority and immigrant populations,
specifically Latinos, Southeast Asians, Asians and
Pacific Islanders. What sort of
outreach has your campaign
done in these communities, and what have you learned
about what these communities' specific needs?"
"I have reached
out to all these communities and asked them to identify
their needs. Their response has been for more vocational
training, senior assistance, ending gang violence, and
more state outreach and communication with their
communities. One of the key components of my internal
campaign is a diversity task force. I turn to them
often."[Where
they stand,
Nonetheless, it seems like she has
made it harder for illegals to get driver's licenses,
because they have sued
the state over the issue.
Shortly before the deadline for the implementation of
the
REAL ID Act, the Alaska Legislature passed a
resolution banning the use of state funds to enforce
it. Palin is on
record opposing this resolution, and refused to sign the
bill. But she let it pass without a veto. Supposedly
this was done because the legislature would have
overridden her veto and she did not want to waste
political capital on the issue. This seems awfully
analogous to
Obama's voting
"present" in the
state legislature,
which Rudy Giuliani
attacked during his convention speech.
It is a safe bet to guess that Palin
is against licenses for illegals, but again, it does not
seem high on her priority list.
There are a few things outside Palin's record that
suggest she might be good on immigration. Talk show and
long time Palin supporter Laura Ingraham says she has
talked to Palin about immigration, and has
assured her listeners that
"she's not for comprehensive reform, I can tell you
that right now. She's sick to death of this immigration
nonsense in the
This sounds promising, but without any elaboration or
any public statements to back it up, it's not
conclusive.
Palin may have been a
Pat Buchanan supporter during his 1996 campaign for
president, although this is disputed. But if in fact
Palin supported Buchanan, the fact that she won't admit
it says something about how far she's willing to push
the envelope. Pat won
Moreover, even if Palin did support Pat, it doesn't
necessarily mean she supports his immigration policy
anymore than she supports his foreign policy—where she
now clearly diverges from Buchanan. And, unlike in many
other states, the
pro-life movement was solidly behind Buchanan in
Palin's inaction does not mean that
she supports
amnesty or any other bad policy. Besides a little
pandering, she hasn't done anything objectionable and a
little good on the issue.
Now
that
Palin is a national figure, and the biggest hero for
conservatives, she could take it upon herself to make a
strong and vocal stand against amnesty, with no charges
of flip-flopping. Unfortunately, it's impossible to
imagine her doing this
while campaigning with John McCain.
For
immigration reform patriots, Palin remains
a pig in a poke—despite the lipstick
Marcus Epstein [send him mail] is the founder of the Robert A Taft Club and the executive director of the The American Cause and Team America PAC. A selection of his articles can be seen here. The views he expresses are his own.