Oy Caramba! Balanced SF Chronicle Article On English Language Debate
The San
Francisco Chronicle headline read:
"43%
in state speak other than English at home."
[
Unlike the
Washington Post's
constantly biased coverage of the
overall immigration crisis, Hendricks cites a major
concern early on in the
Chron piece,:
" 'It's
very disturbing when 1 in 5 people is not communicating
in the common language,' said
Victor Davis Hanson, a
senior
fellow at the
The Chron
piece then allows a second opinion:
" 'It's not that
immigrants don't want to integrate—it's that they need
more opportunities to learn English,' said
Jin Sook Lee, an assistant professor of education at
UC Santa
Barbara, who remembers the oversubscribed
English-as-a-second-language classes she used to
teach at
community college.
"But she
also doesn't believe
" 'The fact
that people speak a
different language in their homes is one of the most
untapped resources in our country," Lee said. "With
globalization in economics and politics, we need
language competence. These speakers have a great
potential to fill out this language gap in our society.'
"
Hey, we should all be in favor of
Americans learning a second language—or a third or
fourth–as long as
the primary common tongue is English, which should
be made the
official language of the
And that
is not going to be simple:
"In
Whoa, Dr. Rumberger. As I recall over 30 million
Californians
are not
immigrants! But at least the article allows its
readers to
think for themselves as how extremely off the wall
that "totally
dependent" view is.
My many
non-immigrant friends and business associates are keenly
worried by this fact reported by Hendricks:
"
But of course all
Americans who aren't brain dead realize that the
It is not
surprising at all that,
"In California,
the direction is toward more settled immigrants and a
second generation and increasing language proficiency
among the foreign-born," [said
Michael Fix, co-director of the
National Center for Immigrant Integration Policy at
the Migration Policy Institute in Washington, D.C.]
"The share of
people who speak Spanish at home who speak English as
well has risen over time. So instead of the worrisome
story about (a lack of) cohesion, there's a positive
story here. ... The share of new immigrant arrivals in
A bit of a
Pollyanna, I think, Mr. Fix. As
Roy
Beck, President of NumbersUSA has noted, the period
of 1925 to 1965 was the Golden Age of US Immigration,
when an average of under 200,000 newcomers per year
could be integrated comfortably into American life. The
millions of legal and illegal aliens here now so far
surpasses that era that cultural integration has reached
crisis proportions.
This article notes the dilemma of bilingual instruction
and the importance of making English an urgent
priority—although obviously
not enough of a priority:
"
Under the bold
subheading, "Essential
skill," the article concludes with a highly sensible
exposition of the language issue.
"'Learning
English is an essential skill for immigrants and their
children, both for their personal success and for the
good of the nation,' said
Tomás Jiménez, an Irvine Fellow at the New America
Foundation, a nonpartisan public policy think tank.
" 'To
borrow a non-English phrase, English is the lingua
franca of the
Hey, Professor, "additive" implies non-primary.
But Jimenez does understand that
" 'Government could do more to make English classes
available to adults and help them integrate into
society'.....He pointed to
Santa Clara County's Office of Human Relations,
which promotes citizenship, English and leadership among
immigrants, as a good example."
Would that the
New York Times and the
Washington Post would have equally good reports
on immigration and the issue of English as our key glue.
(Congratulate
Chronicle's
Hendricks)
Donald A. Collins [email him], is a freelance writer living in Washington DC and a former long time member of the board of FAIR, the Federation for American Immigration Reform. His views are his own.