Recent News

The original "Hollywood blacklist" dates back to 1947, when 10 members of the Communist Party, present or former, invoked the Fifth Amendment before the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

The party was then a wholly owned subsidiary of the Comintern of Joseph Stalin, whose victims had surpassed in number those of Adolf Hitler.

In a 346-17 vote, the Hollywood Ten were

[See also: "Voter Suppression"—Obama Regime Code For "Resisting American Dispossession" By Peter Gadiel]

The simplest way to understand the Obama Administration’s attack yesterday (March 13) on  Texas’ new voter ID law: it is blatantly in the business of Electing A New People—and, to that end, voter fraud is almost as helpful as illegal immigration.

Fox News  reported:

On Monday, the Justice Department's head of the civil rights division, Tom Perez, sent a six-page letter to Texas' director of elections saying that Texas has not "sustained its burden" under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to show that the new law will not have a discriminatory effect on minority voters. About 11 percent of Hispanic voters reportedly lack state-issued identification…

"According to the state's own data, a Hispanic registered voter is at least 46.5 percent, and potentially 120.0 percent, more likely than a non-Hispanic registered voter to lack this identification," Perez wrote.[Justice Department files objection to Texas voter ID law, March 12, 2012. Links added by VDARE.com]

To put this in perspective:

• The other day I purchased a bottle of wine. The casher smiled at me—and asked for my identification, to verify I was 21 years of age and legally able to purchase alcohol.
• Recently, before being subjected to molestation by a TSA official after I opted out of going through the x-ray scanner that doubles as a carcinogen, I had to show proof of identification to verify that the name on the airplane ticket was really mine.

Simple enough, right? Just produce a state issued driver’s license, federally issued passport or government identity card.

Do the Obamaniacs think Hispanics don’t drink? Fly?

In states throughout the U.S., Republican legislatures have been working to pass sensible laws that would require the showing of photo identification before voting.

Sounds reasonable, right?

Not to Obama's Attorney General Eric "My People" Holder, Perez’ boss and the guy running a notoriously

Peter Brimelow writes: VDARE.com is a coalition and Linda Thom is one of our valued Democrats. She thinks VDARE.com has been too easy on Rush Limbaugh—which may well be true: I’ve been pretty desensitized over the years by all the things said about me, and anyway I think Political Correctness is the more important problem. Here Linda sets me straight. Note that we bleep out some expletives here, not to make a moral statement, but because VDARE.com has quite enough trouble with corporate censorware as it is).

I recently had a discussion with a local Democratic politician who had read an article I had written for VDARE.com about immigrant-employment, or the lack thereof, on the island where I live in Washington State. She said that she completely agreed with everything I said—but as a politician, she would never say those things because they would hurt people’s feelings.  

Of course a local politician would say this. What is the benefit in discussing the negative consequences of immigration where not much immigration exists?

Practicing civil behavior in uncivil times takes courage. But it also allows people to listen and think. So giving comfort and solace to Rush Limbaugh (as I think VDARE.com has done) is a bad idea because his language is uncivil and offensive. It causes a great emotional stir. And when emotions stir, thinking stops.

Of course, Limbaugh has the absolute right to use whatever language he wishes except to yell “fire” in a crowded theater. The Supremes have said so. But when Limbaugh called a college woman a slut for wanting contraceptives covered by insurance, the uproar that followed was all about his language—not about birth control, or insurance.

Slut: n. derog. Sloven, slattern, trollop, whore, prostitute, street walker, lady of the evening, woman of ill repute, lose or fallen woman, call girl.

Slut is a sexist slur just as ni**er is a racist slur. What is the male equivalent of slut? Stud; you go dude! Slut and ni**er are Politically Incorrect for a reason. To use either of these words

Keish Kim (seen above testifying to the Georgia House Higher Education Committee) is an illegal alien from Korea.  She is a classic candidate for strategic deportation. 

And while they’re at it, our law enforcement Finest might also do something about ICE chief John Morton.  He is responsible for the fact that Kim is not only at large, but openly and publically demanding special benefits as an illegal alien.

Look at this Atlanta Journal-Constitution story:

Illegal immigrants would be barred from attending all Georgia public colleges under a bill a Senate committee passed Wednesday.

Senate Bill 458 also would relax some requirements and tighten others as it relates to the sweeping immigration bill lawmakers passed last year. But it was the proposed rule of banning some students from the 35 colleges in the University System of Georgia and the 25 in the Technical College System of Georgia that occupied nearly all of the 90-minute discussion.

The bill moves on to the full Senate, and it’s hard to say what will happen next. House Speaker David Ralston, R-Blue Ridge, and Gov. Nathan Deal have said they’re reluctant to tinker with current immigration law. The Senate bill is similar to House Bill 59, which a committee debated in January but has yet to vote on.

Sen. Barry Loudermilk, R-Cassville, sponsored SB 458 and described it as a simple measure. He said illegal immigrants are taking college slots away from citizens and stressed they won’t be able to legally work in this country after graduation…

Loudermilk and others said the University System is violating federal law by admitting these students because attending a public college is a benefit reserved for lawful residents.

Committee Passes Bill Banning Illegal Immigrants From Ga. Public Colleges, by Laura Diamond, February 22, 2012

Senator Loudermilk is absolutely correct.  Federal law already prohibits aliens from attending any school in the United States, pre- or post-secondary, except for legal permanent resident aliens, asylees, refugees, and a certain narrow class of non-immigrant aliens lawfully admitted and lawfully present.  (The disgraceful Plyler vs. Doe decision merely said that local governments could not exclude illegal alien students from public school in default of federal action. In other words, there is no reason that federal agents could not deport illegal aliens right out of the classroom).

The MSM didn’t tell you that? It’s important. But for the moment, we will stick with the arrogant scofflaw Keish Kim. 

• She is an illegal alien. 
• She is appearing in public demanding special rights and privileges from American taxpayers. 
• Even worse, she wants to study to be an attorney. 

If there is anything that America does not need, it is more shysters.  We already have more than the world’s share of attorneys.  We don’t need her. 

Perhaps her homeland, the Republic of Korea, could do with some attorneys. But for some reason (what? this is South, non-Communist, Korea we’re talking about), she does not want to go back.

Kim’s most recent testimony that got her mug plastered all over the internet—the same internet that ICE has access to—is not even the first time that she appeared in public and testified against a bill banning all illegal aliens from Georgia post-secondary educational institutions:

The committee heard testimony from a long list of people, most of whom opposed the bill.

Keish Kim, 20, an illegal immigrant from Korea who lives in Roswell, told the committee she graduated from high school in 2009 and was accepted to several of the state’s most competitive schools, but couldn’t attend them because her family couldn’t afford out-of-state tuition.

“I was very afraid and I was very upset because I just wanted to learn,” she said in emotional testimony, adding that she watched her dreams of becoming a lawyer “fall to the ground.”

[Bill Would Bar Illegal Immigrants From Georgia Colleges, by Kate Brumback, Augusta Chronicle, January 31, 2012]

Because of the difference between out-of-state and in-state tuition? What about out-of-state Americans?

And even before that, Keish Kim testified to the  Board of Regents on November 8, 2011. It was recorded for the world to see and posted on YouTube. (Bring your Kleenex). 

Here she did not just merely ask, but demanded accommodation and benefits for herself and other illegal aliens.  She whines about racism and discrimination—but does not mention that the ROK has plenty of institutes of higher education.

Worse than this tear-jerking, exploitative nonsense from the Treason Lobby: proponents of DREAM Act-type legislation at the state level are using false and misleading information from ICE to justify allowing illegal aliens to attend post-secondary education.

This is not new. In 2008, at the end of the Bush Regime, an ICE spokesman actually claimed that Federal law does not prohibit aliens from attending post-secondary education institutions.

RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina's community colleges can decide whether they want to enroll illegal immigrants, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency said Friday…

Richard Rocha, a spokesman for ICE, said Friday that illegal immigrants can apply to any school, but they run the risk of deportation if they are caught in the country.

"It is left for the school to decide whether or not to enroll out-of-status or undocumented non-immigrants," Rocha said in a statement. "The Department of Homeland Security does not require any school to determine a student’s (immigration) status."

[Feds: Colleges Can Enroll Illegal Immigrants, WRAL.com, May 9, 2008]

That could not be more false.  The Immigration and

Native-born Hispanics were the big winners in the February jobs data, released on March 9. Immigrant displacement of native-born workers eased, but displacement over the entire Obama years to date remains close to record highs.

The economy added another 227,000 jobs last month, and January’s job gain was revised upward to 284,000, according to the business employment survey. Both figures exceeded the expectations of most economists. But the unemployment rate didn’t budge. It remained stuck at 8.3%.

 “Today’s employment report provides further evidence that the economy is continuing to heal from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression,” intoned White House economic advisor Alan Krueger, [Email him] adding that “It is critical that we continue the economic policies that are helping us dig our way out of the deep hole that was caused by the recession….”

He’s been using the same line about healing from “the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression" since October 2011. [Cliché Watch: New Jobs Numbers, Same White House Message, Atlantic, March 9, 2012]

Reality check: Despite months of unexpectedly robust job gains 5.4 million fewer people were working last month than at the start of recession. The “other” employment survey, of households rather than businesses, puts the job shrinkage at 4.2 million.

The Household Survey is rarely headlined in the MSM. To do so would reveal inconvenient economic truths about differing employment rates by race, ethnicity, and nativity.  Only in the Household Survey can we see, for example, that Hispanic employment has increased by a 1.124 million, or 5.5% since the recession started in December 2007, while non-Hispanic employment decreased by 5.4 million, or 4.3% over the same period.

That’s right: as far as jobs are concerned, only non-Hispanics are in recession.

Last month we reported that an astounding 96% of new jobs went to Hispanics. In percentage terms, Hispanic